This Stixall range is also impregnated with a powerful biocide that prevents mould growth while still being solvent free. Stixall is resistant to temperature extremes -40° C to +150° C External and internal perimeter pointing around doors and windows, especially in mobile structures such as caravans and boats.

Metals, most plastics, glass, concrete,plaster, plasterboard, Polyester, Perspex, glass, wood, enamel,painted surfaces etc.For extreme power, Stixall is the ultimate combined hybrid polymer adhesive and sealant. It will bond and seal virtually everything to anything in nearly all conditions and can be overpainted if required. Trade Discounted Option Box of 12 One part, chemically curing solvent free sealant and adhesive combining the best qualities of silicone and polyurethane technologies.

Not for use as part of a glazing system. Not for use in aquarium manufacture. Use EVERBUILD® AQUA MATE®. In areas of high UV, some darkening/discolouration may occur. This will not affect the performance of the product. My memory of the MSDS data is that OB1 was essentially the same as CT1 apart from an additional component. I can't remember what it was but did write that I thought it likely to enhance cross-linking to either speed up setting time or strength of the material, probably both (by promoting formation of urethane links). EB25 uses cutting-edge technology to bring superior flexibility and incredible bond strength in a product you can rely on in any situation. Suitable for use both indoors and outdoors, EB25 can be used on virtually any material in most weather conditions and can even be used underwater. Overall, Stixall can be used for any application requiring high performance, durable sealing and bonding of joints and applications where resistance to chemical spillage is required. Buying Stixall from ERoofingOur hybrid polymer adhesives and sealants are developed with the knowledge built up over 25 years of helping the trade, just like our entire collection of sealants. It is specifically designed to adhere to most common building surfaces and these surface to each other. There were posts about the "similarity" with CT1 and that it was actually an improved formulation. Also a threat of legal action plus mention in advertising that the OB1 formulation had been in use for over 15 years and made by a private company. I could not find details of the manufacturer and it almost seemed to be a big secret. It appeared reasonable to assume that some sort of legally binding agreement had been signed regarding direct competition or comparison with CT1 by name (could be wrong).